[email protected] wrote:
> Full_Name: Max Bolingbroke
> Version: LMDB HEAD
> OS: OS X
> URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/max-bolingbroke-140730.patch
> Submission from: (NULL) (81.111.197.81)
>
>
> 1. When using mdb_cursor_get(MDB_FIRST_DUP) or mdb_cursor_get(MDB_LAST_DUP) 
> on a
> cursor that is currently positioned on a key without any duplicate values, 
> then
> we should return MDB_NOTFOUND rather than EINVAL.

Rethinking this, I think it should simply return the existing non-dup value. 
mdb_cursor_count already handles a similar situation, returning 1 for the 
count when there are no dups.

> 2. When using mdb_cursor_get(MDB_NEXT_DUP) on a cursor that is currently
> positioned on the final key in the database, we should not return MDB_NOTFOUND
> unless the value we are on is actually the final one within that key.

OK.

-- 
   -- Howard Chu
   CTO, Symas Corp.           http://www.symas.com
   Director, Highland Sun     http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
   Chief Architect, OpenLDAP  http://www.openldap.org/project/


Reply via email to