--On Sunday, March 19, 2017 12:07 AM +0000 [email protected] wrote:

> I'd say it works as designed and there is no bug.
>
> The work-around for your use-case is to use SUP to derive from a common
> attribute type. But this should be discussed on openldap-technical
> mailing list.

Agreed.  I've moved this to the enhancement queue in case anyone ever wants 
to work on enforcing uniqueness across > 1 attribute, but I would think 
that would require all of the attributes to have the same syntax, etc.

Michael's suggestion for this specific use case seems to be the best 
solution for now.

--Quanah



--

Quanah Gibson-Mount
Product Architect
Symas Corporation
Packaged, certified, and supported LDAP solutions powered by OpenLDAP:
<http://www.symas.com>




Reply via email to