Markus Junginger wrote:
> I perfectly see that MDB_VL32 is the superior as a feature. On the other
> hand I'm a bit worried that it may hold up LMDB development for use cases
> you refer to as obsolete yourself.
> While there are workarounds for this particular bug (which we applied),

There was never a bug here. The doc is quite explicit

After txn_abort the only valid call on a still-open cursor is cursor_renew, 
not cursor_close.
   -- Howard Chu
   CTO, Symas Corp. 
   Director, Highland Sun
   Chief Architect, OpenLDAP

Reply via email to