Markus Junginger wrote:
>> There was never a bug here. The doc is quite explicit
>> After txn_abort the only valid call on a still-open cursor is
>> cursor_renew, not cursor_close.
> However you want to call it, are you open to improve this workflow?
> API-wise, it would be so much simpler just to free a cursor after it became
> obsolete. It's counter-intuitive to open a new txn, renew the cursor, close
> the cursor, and abort the txn - just to close a cursor.

API-wise, it is much simpler to just close the cursor before closing its 
transaction, if you have no need to reuse the cursor.

   -- Howard Chu
   CTO, Symas Corp. 
   Director, Highland Sun
   Chief Architect, OpenLDAP

Reply via email to