On 1/20/19 2:14 AM, Howard Chu wrote: > Ah, the 2nd cn=config mod has requested a pause, which can't succeed until all > background threads complete. And no new threads will be run while a pause is > being requested.
Exactly. > This was the safest approach, considering that a config change could > alter/remove context out > from under running threads otherwise. No, the safest approach is to fail the 2nd cn=config mod unless the user says it's OK to block the server.
