On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 11:41:07PM +0000, Howard Chu wrote: > Thanks for the report. Note that if you simply set a "timeout" with no > specific > qualifiers, it would have worked for you as well.
Oh dear. Of course. And it says so cleary on the man page, too. Thank you! > At this point, the "extended" timeout was meant for the other exops that > back-ldap > supports, e.g. whoami and passwordModify. Since 2.4 is feature frozen we are > not > going to implement the extended timeout feature here. > > Instead, I've changed the start_tls code to use the "bind" timeout, since it > will > always be used as part of a bind operation anyway. OK, thanks a lot! --Janne / Helsinki Uni
