Dusty Doris wrote:
Do you want me to file an ITS for it anyway for documentation purposes? On a side note, do you think it would be better for me to be testing with CVS HEAD vs REL_ENG_2_3?
Sure go ahead and file the ITS with the backtrace, better to have a tracking number than not.
Thanks for the update on it. I'll give CVS HEAD a go next.
I think REL_ENG_2_3 is pretty much sync'd up with HEAD now, try it instead of HEAD.
-Dusty Doris On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Howard Chu wrote: > This is a known bug, already fixed in CVS HEAD. The fix will be in > 2.3.5. I don't believe an ITS was filed for it.
-- -- Howard Chu Chief Architect, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc OpenLDAP Core Team http://www.openldap.org/project/
