On Dim 20 novembre 2005 17:46, Pierangelo Masarati wrote: > On Sun, 2005-11-20 at 08:23 -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: > >> > What if the network is down for two days, and the first day one at one >> > site needs to change the password, because it's expiring, and the >> > following day his password expires so at the other site it gets locked >> > and other policy-related attrs are set by the administrator; guess >> what >> > happens when the network comes back: will he ever be able to logon? >> >> The question here seems to be whether or not you can use dual syncrepl'd >> masters as opposed to multi-master. multi-master isn't likely to solve >> this problem well either. > > That's exactly my point.
Ok, so syncrepl does not seem to be a good idea in the case of two masters in different places. What about the case of two load-balanced masters? Will syncrepl garantee that the data are the same on the two master? Or is it just as old multimaster code: it push (in fact pull) the modifications and does not check that the master's state is like the other's? Raphael Ouazana.
