Should I file this as a bug? On 8/22/06, TechnoSophos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When using the slapacl program to test ACLs, how come slapacl inidcates that a user has 'read' permissions when the ACL restricts to 'auth' only?### # slapacl -D 'uid=matt,ou=Users,dc=example,dc=com' -b 'uid=barbara,ou=Users,dc=example,dc=com' -d acl 'cn/read' Backend ACL: access to attrs=userPassword by anonymous auth by self write by * none Backend ACL: access to attrs=cn by users auth by self write by * none Backend ACL: access to * by self write by users read by * none authcDN: "uid=matt,ou=users,dc=example,dc=com" => access_allowed: read access to "" "cn" requested => access_allowed: backend default read access granted to "uid=matt,ou=users,dc=example,dc=com" read access to cn: ALLOWED ### Note that the same things happens if I substitute '=x' for 'auth' in the acl. Thanks, Matt (OpenLDAP version: 2.3.25)
For those of you perishing few who still have a problem with top posting: should I file this as a bug?
