Im using the ldbm backend as was suggested for debian (I can't recall from where I got this). I think it internally uses bdb 4.3
I would rather stay with the version packaged with my distribution if there is no known issue with it. I have no control over the master-server, but as far as i know it also uses an openldap 2.2.x. Quanah Gibson-Mount schrieb: > > > --On Friday, October 27, 2006 10:48 AM -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> >> --On Friday, October 27, 2006 7:17 PM +0200 David Pruem >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm running an openldap 2.2.23 replica on a debian 3.1 (sarge) system. >>> Once in a while the index gets damaged and I have to use slapreindex to >>> get authentication working again. >>> >>> The master server is running on fedora core (I don't know the version). >>> >>> Is there anything I can do about this problem? >> >> Well, I've never seen that behavior, and your report is kind of vague on >> the details. But I'd certainly recommend using a current version of >> OpenLDAP (2.3.28 is the current release). Or at least use 2.2.30, which >> was the final 2.2 release. >> >> What version of BDB is your replica using? 4.2? 4.3? > > Howard reminded me to ask... What database backend are you using? LDBM? > BDB? > > --Quanah > > -- > Quanah Gibson-Mount > Principal Software Developer > ITS/Shared Application Services > Stanford University > GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html -- Hochschule der Medien Studiengang Informationsdesign Wolframstrasse 32 D-70191 Stuttgart ++49 (0)711 25706 114
