Pierangelo Masarati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Unless you developed something very specific that's not documented yet,
> I suggest you rather propose improvements to the official documentation,
> in case it was not clear enough, or even disguising.  What you set up is
> a very basic and common feature, I think it rather deserves better
> official description that yet another unofficial, partial and quickly
> out-of-date howto...

Where is the documentation that explains how to make slurpd working with
certificate authentication, by the way? I'm all for improving it, but I
don't know where to work: the guide? The FAQ?

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to