Patches should be submitted using the ITS <http://www.openldap.org/its/>. In any case, you should definitely patch HEAD code, as 2.3.35 is months old and in a long ago feature-frozen development branch, the current being 2.4.
I'll note that having the database in memory is an improper use, since it breaks data persistency. So it should at least be a configure and not a build option. p. > Sorry, but I could not understand the meaning of back-bdb residing in > HEAD. > > I have attached a diff over openldap-2.3.35 for changes regarding BDB > in-memory. > This mainly has changes for keeping logs,environment and databases in > memory. > The bdb in-memory code is under #ifdef BDB_INMEMORY > > I am trying out different environment cache sizes to check any > performance > difference. Ing. Pierangelo Masarati OpenLDAP Core Team SysNet s.r.l. via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA http://www.sys-net.it --------------------------------------- Office: +39 02 23998309 Mobile: +39 333 4963172 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------------------
