Pierangelo Masarati wrote: > I think in this case we're sort of chasing a red herring (is this the > right idiom?); in fact, the auditContext only makes sense in the provider. > In the consumer it should at least be a referral, since no log context is > present, but actually the consumer shouldn't be aware of that context, not > that way, at least. The best solution, IMHO, is to remove the > auditContext attribute from the replicated attrs.
I'm fine with not replicating attribute auditContext. Ciao, Michael.
