Hello Aaron, >> I know it is a weird question, but we had huge problems with compiling >> things with the standard sun ldd.
>I don't think you mean ldd, I think you mean ld. Of course you are right - shame on me for not spotting that mix up. >I'm not aware of any ldd >reimplementation -- who reimplements the dynamic linker for Solaris? >(Don't answer that, it would make my head hurt...) Oh, well, I would not know. >The major ld choices are /usr/ccs/bin/ld (from Sun) or a GNU binutils ld. >Some versions/builds of GNU binutils are hopelessly flawed. You would >probably do well to ensure that /usr/ccs/bin/ld is being used. Yes, that is exactly what we had to do. >One "easy" way to ensure this would be to use the (free as in beer) Sun >Studio compilers, http://developers.sun.com/sunstudio/. They are known to >work with OpenLDAP. That is useful information - could that be stored somewhere in the OpenLDAP FAQs? IIRC, that isnt there yet. >Alternately...start poking at your GNU toolchain and >your environment. That makes my head spin ;) Claus
