Quanah Gibson-Mount writes: >> Is it possible to give a subtree of a database higher sizelimits (hard, >> unchecked) than the rest of the database? I thought I'd managed it by >> putting the subtree in a subordinate database, but now that gets the >> same limit anyway, even when I search with the subtree DN as baseDN. > > Sounds like an RFE to me.
I take it that means "no":-) OK, coming up... In the mean time I guess we can give the subtree baseDN a public password and use this: access to dn.subtree=<baseDN> by * read access to * by dn.exact=<baseDN> by * none break limits dn.exact=<baseDN> size.hard=unlimited size.unchecked=unlimited I don't really see anything wrong with that (at least with our ACLs), but it does make me uncomfortable. -- Regards, Hallvard
