On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 01:38:48PM -0800, Howard Chu wrote: > John Morrissey wrote: > > We haven't upgraded our provider to 2.4 yet, since we wanted to get some > > consumers upgraded first. Would running a 2.4 provider with 2.3 > > consumers be OK? The contextCSN format changed to add fractional > > seconds; will that have any adverse impact on existing 2.3 consumers > > that try to continue syncrepling? > > A recent enough 2.3 will accept 2.4-format CSNs.
2.3.42 should be recent enough, correct? john -- John Morrissey _o /\ ---- __o [EMAIL PROTECTED] _-< \_ / \ ---- < \, www.horde.net/ __(_)/_(_)________/ \_______(_) /_(_)__
