I notice that you are talking about only one F5? How do you have your secondary F5 configured?? Perhaps the issue is in that?
Granted, I realize this doesn't contribute to the conversation, but it does raise a point. Just saying... ----- Original Message ----- From: openldap-software-bounces+tomryan=camlaw.rutgers....@openldap.org <openldap-software-bounces+tomryan=camlaw.rutgers....@openldap.org> To: John Madden <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: Tue Jul 21 22:03:52 2009 Subject: Re: performance issue behind a a load balancer 2.3.32 yep, for a production environment, running on only one, is a sure fire way to earn myself a sparkling new pink slip... -- David J. Andruczyk ----- Original Message ---- From: John Madden <[email protected]> To: David J. Andruczyk <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 4:47:07 PM Subject: Re: performance issue behind a a load balancer 2.3.32 On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 12:39 -0700, David J. Andruczyk wrote: > This is a large production environment (several hundred servers, > thousands of requests per minute) and the F5-LB is used to balance the > load and take care if a node needs to be taken out of service for maint Given, I run a smaller environment, but even on a several-years-old v2.2.x install I regularly see several thousand requests per second -- not minute -- with tons of logging enabled -- handled while hardly touching the CPU. Are you sure you really need multiple machines? John -- John Madden Sr UNIX Systems Engineer Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana [email protected]
