Thank you! If you have some news drop me an e-mail.
In the mean while I'll work on improvements, according my needs, of the script you point me out. Thank you again Andrea On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Sam Tran <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Andrea Cirulli <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi Sam, > > we are using syncrepl mechanism, and we don't decide yet if the consumer > > will point to a specific IP ( let's say half of consumer on multimaster1 > and > > the rest on multimaster 2) or pointing to Virtual IP of a RADWARE that is > in > > charge of balancing ( only failover not load balancing). > > In any case, I have to implent or found a solution more general as > possible, > > in order to handle the two scenarios. > > If you have any suggestion or something already implemented I will > > appreciate your help. > > We have decided to point the consumers to a virtual IP fronting the > pair of providers for LDAP replication. > In my tests where I manually fail over from one provider to the other, > syncrepl in refreshAndPersist mode works with no problem. > Delta-syncrepl most of the time works. But I had instances where > replication was lagging; the consumer manages to contact the active > provider, but queries to the accesslog database return no entry when > an ldapsearch with the same filter on the command line returns more > than one entry. Eventually the consumer would resync again. > > I am updating my python script that checks whether a given consumer is > in sync with the provider. Once I am done I can share it with you if > you wish. Buchan wrote a Perl script that does something similar and > works with Nagios: > http://www.zarb.org/~bgmilne/hobbit/bb-openldap.pl > > -- > Sam > -- Andrea Cirulli
