On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Guillaume Rousse <[email protected]> wrote: > Is this really necessary to check constraint violations when using syncrepl > ? We already have a 'schemachecking' directive, we may have an additional > 'constraintchecking' one. At least, an explicit error message for 'sync' > level would have been more meaningful.
I haven't followed the beginning of this thread but I lately moved many replicas to OpenLDAP 2.4 and found it easier to just remove schemachecking in my case. That said, we don't have a big database nor big writes. A couple of additional schemas but all standard (courier, samba, etc...) Cheers, Steph
