В Птн, 19/03/2010 в 10:14 +0100, Michael Ströder пишет: > Russ Allbery wrote: > > Dan Pritts <da...@internet2.edu> writes: > >> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:36:09AM -0400, Alex McKenzie wrote: > > > >>> perhaps something the devels should think about. If they decide to > >>> continue on the way they have... well, that's their option. It's their > >>> project, and they can do what they want with it. But they should at > >>> least be aware that people are concerned about the current methods. > > > >> I tend to agree with Alex, FWIW, but I too recognize that I get what I > >> pay for. > > > > Out of fairness want to note that the most significant component of the > > problems with the OpenLDAP packages for Debian (and Ubuntu, to a somewhat > > lesser degree) is that the packaging team has basically no resources. > > In this case I'd prefer if a Linux distribution would not add a package at > all. At least not a package which was obviously an experimental pre-release at > that time. And not hacking the upstream software to work with components known > to be buggy. This would save us all a lot of time.
Again, if not already done so, file a bug against distribution package and read thier considerations. -- Покотиленко Костик <cas...@meteor.dp.ua>
