Tim Mooney wrote: > Is there any appreciable benefit to not loading schema files that I'm > confident we won't be using (java, dyngroup, corba, probably others)? > I generally avoid "kitchen sink" software installation and prefer to pare > down what's enabled in a software package to the bits we need, but I > can't imagine skipping a few schema files is going to save a significant > amount of resources on a modern system with 24 GiB RAM. Is there any > other reason to skip schema files we won't be using?
If you're using schema-aware LDAP clients which load the whole subschema subentry you save bandwidth and client-side processing. My web2ldap caches the pre-parsed subschema subentry for a part of the DIT but the initial loading/parsing of really big subschema subentries (>500 kB) is significant on older systems. Ciao, Michael.
