> I'd note that while the current maximum width of lines is enforced to 76 > chars, they happen to be 78 char long (because of an extra LDIF_KLUDGE set > to 1 and, I guess, of the leading blank). > > In any case, in the spirit of being liberal when needed, I have nothing > against allowing OpenLDAP tools to visualize LDIF with arbitrary width, as > soon as the default behavior remains the original one, in order to avoid > breaking existing software.
See <http://www.openldap.org/its?findid=6645>. p.
