Wouter van Marle <[email protected]> writes: > On 9 Sep 10, at 21:47, Dan White wrote: > >> On 09/09/10 12:47 +0800, Wouter van Marle wrote: [...] > Most important difference is that pam is not mentioned here. But then > from other mails I understand that slapd only wants to use saslauthd > and not pam.
[...] No, slapd doesn't want saslauthd, nor pam, it is just a hack. Please do not use saslauthd authentication agent in a kerberized environment. Make use of proper nativ sasl mechanism. -Dieter -- Dieter Klünter | Systemberatung sip: [email protected] http://www.dpunkt.de/buecher/2104.html GPG Key ID:8EF7B6C6
