> Under the circumstance, I am thinking that one way to go about > getting the required attribute data is to add 'accessFlag' > attribute at the required rdn. This is going to be duplicate > piece of data and any updates to 'accessFlag', would now > result in two updates. However, I will be able to save multiple > reads. In my scenario, we do lot more reads than the updates > on the 'accessFlag' field.
If you're confident you can keep those flags in sync, then it's probably the easiest way to go. p.
