On Wednesday, 29.09.2010 01:59:28 ITPFS oota wrote: > On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 01:50:59AM +0200, Victor Mataré wrote: > > openSuSE, who allegedly use it by default. No idea how they made samba > > work with it, though. In my naïve mind the patch should be almost > > trivial (just use groupOfNames as structuralObjectClass and add a dummy > > member), but I suspect it's not in vanilla samba because of the vague > > status of rfc2307bis. So... any insight on this whole rfc2307bis > > scenario is highly appreciated. > > Please see samba bug #4597 > > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4597 > > OpenSUSE 11.2 patch was already posted. > > -- > --- Oota Toshiya --- t-oota at dh.jp.nec.com > NEC Systems Software Operations Unit Shiba,Minato,Tokyo > IT Platform Solutions Division Japan,Earth,Solar system > (samba-jp/ldap-jp Staff,mutt-j/samba-jp postmaster)
Great, so the solution is on the way I guess. Big pile of thanks for that! But then there's still the quasi-hack status of rfc2307bis, which I'm reluctant to build a production directory on. Anything happening there?
