----- Original Message ----- > On 28/4/2011 3:13 μμ, Torsten Schlabach (Tascel eG) wrote: > > > I never used PowerDNS, we always went with BIND. Fortunately the DLZ > > parts > > made it into the code and the version which has them built in made > > it into > > the standard Linux distros in the meanwhile. > > > > AFAIK there are no plans to drop LDAP backend support from BIND. So > > maybe > > you should just consider to switch there. > > > I just wanted to add that according many testimonies, like: > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/htdig/bind-users/2011-February/082814.html, > BIND9 > with LDAP over DLZ has a very low performance, making it unsuitable > for > production systems,
No, making it unsuitable for directly serving DNS clients. The recommended architecture with bind sdb_ldap for use with a high query load is that a named running sdb_ldap be set up as a "hidden" master, with the slaves running traditional file-backed zones to serve DNS clients. Regards, Buchan
