On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 3:35 AM, Howard Chu <[email protected]> wrote:

> Brett @Google wrote:
>
>> Zytrax might fail with regard to accuracy in specific details as it seems
>> to
>> be infrequently updated (last August 2010, before that July 2009), but
>> taken
>> asis it gets people going such that they can at least get a server
>> running,
>> then they can then start to learn by actively using openldap. The zytrax
>> guide
>> itself is open source, so the other alternative is to help improve it's
>> accuracy ?
>>
>
> Wow, talk about putting the cart before the horse. Last time I checked, the
> OpenLDAP documentation was also open source. If anyone sincerely wants to
> improve the docs and make things easier for new users to get off the ground,
> while getting their edits vetted by people who actually understand how the
> code works, the obvious (to me anyway) thing to do is to submit updates in
> the ITS.
>

I was talking about the NEED for such a document, not talking about who
authored / would author it.

My point (perhaps unclear) was that openldap should have such a document, or
at least not 'dis those who try..


> The Zytrax guys are clearly just out to make a buck, lifting the OpenLDAP
> Admin Guide content and putting a thin layer of "personal experience" around
> it. They're not contributing back to the OpenLDAP community; they're not
> participating in the community at all, and the info they're distributing is
> (as noted) already outdated.
>
>  Such a openldap guide might least serve a purpose, more for newbies as
>> supposed to the old salts, in that it could reduce chatter regards to
>> getting
>> a server compiled/running/loaded etc., in the first place, but call me an
>> optimist.
>>
>
> If you really believe that helping a 3rd party keep their obsolete
> plagiarism of the OpenLDAP Project's work up to date is a good idea,
> "optimist" is not the word I'd use for you.
>

My reference to being an optimist was thinking that the openldap project
might by itself create such a guide. Being an open source project i'm sure
there is plenty of other work needing to be done, besides creating such a
guide.

I am happy enough to have a go at such a guide, but a poet i am not. What is
the preferred document format ?

Cheers
Brett

Reply via email to