Hi Quanah and thank you again for your quick reply,

I did not deleted the *.bdb files, but I moved them in a backup folder.

My /db folder was empty, but the slapindex command failed because both
"dn2id.bdb" and "id2entry.bdb" files was not present. I needed to add them
in the /db folder in order to run the slapindex command.

Then, all index have been re-generated.

After the reindexation, the "cardnumber.bdb" file had the same size than
before.

Could you confirm me that it's the best process to reindex an OpenLDAP?

Thank you,

Mathieu

2012/1/5 Quanah Gibson-Mount <[email protected]>

> Hi Mathieu,
>
> It sounds like you didn't delete the cardnumber.bdb file before
> reindexing? That is what I'd have done.
>
> Also, you previously had some questions about OpenLDAP tuning.  You may
> wish to read over <http://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/**
> OpenLDAP_Performance_Tuning<http://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/OpenLDAP_Performance_Tuning>>.
>  Some of the bits in there have Zimbra specific names, but they all apply
> directly to OpenLDAP and BDB in general.
>
> --Quanah
>
>
> --On Wednesday, January 04, 2012 2:46 PM +0100 "External Mathieu DEDECKER
> (CAMPUS)" <[email protected]**> wrote:
>
>  I will read the man page in order to have more informations about the
>> command.
>>
>> I tried to reindex all the index of the database with the slapindex
>> command, but I allways the same behaviour:
>>
>> Request1: cardnumber=2098001010034  (less than 1sec)
>> Request2: cardnumber=2090389917486  (nearly 20 sec).
>>
>> Other .bdb files size have been updated, but my "cardnumber.bdb" has
>> still the same size.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Mathieu
>>
>>
>> 2012/1/4 Quanah Gibson-Mount <[email protected]>
>>
>> Hi Mathieu,
>>
>> If you read the slapindex man page, it is possibly to just recreate a
>> specific index file (for situations like this), rather than generating
>> all of them.
>>
>> --Quanah
>>
>>
>> --On Wednesday, January 04, 2012 10:39 AM +0100 "External Mathieu
>> DEDECKER (CAMPUS)" <[email protected]**> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Hello Quanah,
>>
>> First I would like to thank you for your answer.
>>
>> Indeed, I also think that the "cardnumber" index is somehow corrupted.
>> His size is to small in comparison to other indexes
>>
>> We suppressed all existing index and Used slapindex to re-create them all.
>>
>> It's undergoing.
>>
>> I will keep you informed about the solution.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> Mathieu
>>
>>
>> 2012/1/3 Quanah Gibson-Mount <[email protected]>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --On Friday, December 23, 2011 11:27 AM +0100 "External Mathieu DEDECKER
>> (CAMPUS)" <[email protected]**> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi @All,
>>
>> We meet a performance problem with our OpenLDAP.
>>
>> We think that we face a problem with the index of the database, and we
>> think that the problem can be resolve by tunning the config (but not
>> sure).
>>
>> We would like to be sure that our configuration is correct, in order to
>> confirm if we are on a wrong track or not.
>>
>> [Description]
>>
>> We have an attribute (cardNumber) which is indexed.
>>
>> When we request the indexed attribute (cardNumber) with an LDAP Client
>> (Ldapbrowser), we have either fast or very long response time.
>>
>> For the long response time, the CPU of the server hits 100%.
>>
>> For example:
>>
>> Request1: cardnumber=2098001010034  (less than 1sec)
>> Request2: cardnumber=2090389917486  (nearly 20 sec).
>>
>> By checking the hit ratio of the attribute, we can see that cache is
>> correctly used (97%).
>>
>>
>> It sounds like you added an index to cardnumber after there was already
>> data for cardnumber in your database, and didn't run slapindex for that
>> attribute.  Alternatively, your cardnumber.bdb file is corrupted.
>>
>> --Quanah
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Quanah Gibson-Mount
>> Sr. Member of Technical Staff
>> Zimbra, Inc
>> A Division of VMware, Inc.
>> --------------------
>> Zimbra ::  the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Quanah Gibson-Mount
>> Sr. Member of Technical Staff
>> Zimbra, Inc
>> A Division of VMware, Inc.
>> --------------------
>> Zimbra ::  the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Quanah Gibson-Mount
> Sr. Member of Technical Staff
> Zimbra, Inc
> A Division of VMware, Inc.
> --------------------
> Zimbra ::  the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
>

Reply via email to