Am 06.08.2012 03:57, schrieb Kurt Zeilenga:
On Aug 5, 2012, at 1:58 PM, Dora Paula <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Another (at least to me much better) solution seems to be to get rid
of the implicit "by * none" code:
So your argument that implicit rules are bad would equally apply to
"by +none stop" as it applies "by =none stop". And what you asking
for is simply a convenience, you don't want to add the "by +none stop"
yourself.
I've not been aware of the possibility to override (neutralize) the
<who> clause lists implicit termination using the in/decremental neutral
element "+none". I've not tested it yet, but I think that's fine. Thanks
for your explaination. Please forget the rest for now.
Perhaps an extension of the slapd.acces(5) with one sentence that just
mentions this possibility makes sense?
