On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 8:32 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount <[email protected]>wrote:
> --On Wednesday, October 31, 2012 10:03 AM +0100 Marco Pizzoli < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Quanah, >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> --On Monday, October 29, 2012 8:52 AM +0100 Marco Pizzoli >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> If I try to configure a second replica configration targeted directly to >> (in example) to ou=ou3, then that ou get replicated. >> >> Any help/advice is welcome. >> >> >> Hi Marco, >> >> You have not provided any useful information with which to help you, so >> there is not really any advice one can offer you. I.e., you have not >> provided the configuration you are using on your master and replicas in >> the scenario where you have multiple DBs. >> >> >> You are absolutely right and I'm aware of it... >> The problem is in this case I can't provide any (even similar >> to)real configuration. Both from technical limitation (remote server >> with no possibility of copy/paste) and corporate policy*. >> >> * Continuing experimenting I found also 2 or 3 cases in which I'm able to >> crash OL 2.4.33 (in one case by simply slapadding using back-mdb) but I >> CAN'T provide any material to file a "valid" ITS. I'm sorry about that. >> > > Hi Marco, > > Your corporate policy sounds so severe, I'm surprised you can even send > email indicating you have faced any issues. Without an ability to provide > useful information, I don't believe there is any way anyone can help you. > > I would suggest you find a way to comply with your corporate policy while > providing useful information. Since I don't know what that policy is, it > is hard to know what you might do, but I'd hope you could supply your > configs minus any passwords and specific schema/attrs or something (i.e., > make generic configs that illustrate the issues you are facing). That's > what I generally do. > > If you require confidentiality, I would suggest a support agreement with > Symas that includes an NDA. > > Quanah, I appreciate you always answering my requests, but in this case my only question was if the problem I was facing is a known issue (at least in OL2.3 we know it was). If not, it could be my fault in the configuration. Maybe someone had a similar problem and could share his experience. By not being able to provide useful configuration snippets, I *have not* asked for a specific help. With your answers, do I have to assume that with OL2.4.x you never faced a problem syncrepl-ing a tree composed by multiple db's, testing both scenarios (more or less) similar to the two I presented from a (very) high-level-view perspective? Thanks again Marco
