Ulrich Windl wrote:
> I wonder what the minimum required access rights for the attributes of
> shadowAccount are: Should they be protected the same way the password is?
> At the moment an anonymous bind can read them (i.e. no special access rules
> present).

by * None should be sufficient.

Serious: You probably won't need 'shadowAccount' at all.

Ciao, Michael.


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to