Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: > I suggest you read the fixes between 2.4.31 and 2.4.36. There were plenty in > those releases. > > --Quanah > > Sent from my iPad > >> On Nov 10, 2013, at 11:13 PM, Ashok Kumar Shah <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> I don't see any fix done for syncrepl on 2.4.36. Speaking about the actual >> problem i have noticed that the do_syncrep* is not getting triggered as >> defined in the config: >> >> interval=00:00:05:00 >> retry="60 +" >> >> and get triggered after long delay about ~23hrs or so. Not sure if this a >> bug.
I'd even recommend to use 2.4.37 now in case slapo-memberof or slapo-refint is used. Ciao, Michael. >>> On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 6:14 AM, Quanah Gibson-Mount <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> I suggest you read the openldap changelog and upgrade to 2.4.36. >>> >>> --Quanah >>> >>>> On Nov 9, 2013, at 12:34 AM, Ashok Kumar Shah <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I have upgraded to OpenLDAP 2.4.31. I was hoping that the syncrepl issue >>>> will subside with the upgrade, but problem continue to persist even now. >>>> Just to point out that the master still runs the older version i.e 2.4.31, >>>> but i guess that should be ok since the issue is with the replication or >>>> perhaps with contextCSN not getting updated on the client(slaves). >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Ashok >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 3:47 AM, Quanah Gibson-Mount <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> --On Sunday, July 14, 2013 10:35 PM +0530 Ashok Kumar Shah >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I am running OpenLDAP 2.4.23. >>>>> >>>>> I would advise you to run a modern release. I would strongly advise you >>>>> to read the changes log since 2.4.23. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --Quanah
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
