Christian Kratzer wrote: > I was always intending to ask what the original use case for > groupOfUniqueNames > actually was as I totally fail to see the point in the uniqueMember > attributes. > > I see lots of people using it just because "oh yeas of course we want to > have unique members".
Most people are using 'groupOfUniqueNames' *without* the UID part in 'uniqueMember' without further thinking just because it was the default in Netscape/iPlanet/SunOne Directory Server. Ciao, Michael.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
