Hi,

Thanks for the explanations....

Regards,
Luc

On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Ulrich Windl <
[email protected]> wrote:

> >>> Howard Chu <[email protected]> schrieb am 16.01.2014 um 11:03 in Nachricht
> <[email protected]>:
> > Ulrich Windl wrote:
> >> Off-topic: I can remember a statement of the late 80ies where a
> programmer
> >> claimed the 32-bit address space is so large that one does not have to
> care
> >> about garbage collection in virtual address space; just use new
> addresses.
> >> I think even with 64 bit one should always try not to waste address
> space.
> >
> > Wow, good thing you're here to remind us of these little details, I would
> > never have thought of that! What on earth will we do now?
> >
> > Oh wait, right in the LMDB design paper, there's a discussion of garbage
> > collection. Someone must have thought of it already, after all. You're
> the
> > worst kind of fool, one who believes he knows more than he actually
> does, in
> > a
> > world where it's trivially easy to acquire the actual facts.
>
> Thanks!
>
> >
> > --
> >    -- Howard Chu
> >    CTO, Symas Corp.           http://www.symas.com
> >    Director, Highland Sun     http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
> >    Chief Architect, OpenLDAP  http://www.openldap.org/project/
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to