Thanks Michael, But instead of changing existing class, i think, it will be better if we create a custom auxiliary class.
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Michael Ströder <[email protected]>wrote: > Vikas Parashar wrote: > > Yes, that should be. Because, you are using two structural class from > > different chain. > > > > Instead of account class, please use extensibleObject. > > Using 'extensibleObject' is really bad practice. > > Hint: One can easily define custom structural object classes adding the > attributes needed. > > Also object classes can be derived from two other object classes. > > SUP ( inetOrgPerson $ account ) > > Ciao, Michael. > >
