On 04/06/2014 14:51, Howard Chu wrote: >> I reported a similar issue a couple of years ago: > > Your issue was reported against back-meta, this post is about back-ldap. The > configurations are not similar at all.
Agreed. I couldn't get the timeout directives to work as expected either though. I don't know if the backends share code as far as connection timeouts are concerned. >> http://www.openldap.org/its/index.cgi/Incoming?id=7372;selectid=7372 >> > From what I see in the mailing list archives, there was nothing to fix. The > timeouts all worked as designed when tested locally. It was you who suggested I file the ITS about it, with a hint to Pierangelo as to where the problem might be: http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-technical/201208/msg00247.html That was more to do with back-meta not falling through to alternative targets, but the timeouts didn't seem to behave as expected either. -- Liam Gretton [email protected] HPC Architect http://www.le.ac.uk/its/ IT Services Tel: +44 (0)116 2522254 University Of Leicester, University Road Leicestershire LE1 7RH, United Kingdom
