I’m setting this up now with 6 servers in 3 datacenters. I considered 6-way 
multi-master but there was a concern about what would happen if multiple 
masters were down and came up with different databases, and some anecdotes 
about situations where multi-master configurations were unable to recover from 
such an event and databases had to be manually copied to fix the problem, so I 
ended up with 2-way MM in my primary DC and 4 slaves. We only have a few 
thousand users (records) at this time but the plan is to eventually scale to 
10M or more.

I’m not sure how to interpret your question regarding “less connections.” 
Multi-master does not reduce load on any one server because every write has to 
be duplicated to every server. A given server may see a smaller number of 
connections from clients, but they will be replaced by requests from the other 
masters. See “18.2.2. N-Way Multi-Master replication” here:

http://www.openldap.org/doc/admin24/replication.html

If by “ring” you mean that each master in a MM configuration only connects to 2 
other masters, I haven’t seen that. It’s not obvious to me what would be the 
benefit. The same number of requests creates the same load over 2, 4 or 100 
connections. If you have large numbers of clients connecting you would use a 
load-balancer to aggregate them into one connection per server.

Years ago I ran a large Zimbra system, and we scaled by adding LDAP slaves to a 
single master until the reads from the slaves started overwhelming the master, 
then we added a second tier of slaves between the master and the responders. Of 
course adding slaves only helps if you have large numbers of reads and small 
numbers of writes. I don’t know how to scale large numbers of writes; 
fortunately this is not a problem that we will be seeing anytime soon so I have 
plenty of time to figure it out.

From: openldap-technical [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of hab
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 3:12 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: openldap: 3+ multi datacentre replication

Could you share any experience setting-up/expanding (large) ldap server to 
multi data centres(DC)?
What strategy do you use - mesh or ring topology?
Looking for examples where 3+ DCs with failover(master/master or master/slave) 
ldap setup in each DC.
Is ring topology better than mesh as ldap has to only deal with less 
connections? Would be nice if you can mention any scaling issues?



Reply via email to