Am Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:02:23 +0000 schrieb "Bannister, Mark" <[email protected]>:
> Hi Michael, > > > > If we're primarily adding or deleting entire objects, however, > > > not modifying single attributes, won't delta-syncrepl just fall > > > back to syncrepl anyway? > > > > Can't you change your modification process to modify entries > > instead of deleting and re-adding them? > > I didn't say we deleted and re-added stuff. We will modify if the > object needs modifying, but most of our operations involve either > adding brand new objects, or deleting old ones. > > > > And this still doesn't change the fact that I'm now going to have > > > to spin up 10-20 LDAP replicas on a single machine to get around > > > the single-threaded replication engine problem. > > > > This is the concept of "replication hubs". You can do this to > > spread the syncrepl load. > > Ah, "replication hubs", yes. I'd rather not have to go down this > route unless I have to, but at the moment it seems there is little > choice. You may consider cascading replication, as demonstrated in test019 -Dieter -- Dieter Klünter | Systemberatung http://sys4.de GPG Key ID: E9ED159B 53°37'09,95"N 10°08'02,42"E
