Hi all,

I've 2 ldap instance in mirror mode which each one has its consumer.
Since a few days, even if contextCSN attributs gave me the info that all 
instance are in sync (as shown below), this is not the case !!
I did ldapsearch against the 2 provider for one branch and I found difference 
in number of entries.

I also did it against consumer and I saw a difference between consumer/provider 
for sys1 but not for consumer/provider for sys2 which were in sync. !! very 
strange ...

sys1 - 389 (consumer)
contextCSN: 20151208154738.903128Z#000000#001#000000
contextCSN: 20151208154739.102248Z#000000#002#000000

sys1 - 3892 (provider)
contextCSN: 20151208154738.903128Z#000000#001#000000
contextCSN: 20151208154739.102248Z#000000#002#000000

sys2 - 389 (consumer)
contextCSN: 20151208154738.903128Z#000000#001#000000
contextCSN: 20151208154739.102248Z#000000#002#000000

sys2 - 3892 (provider)
contextCSN: 20151208154738.903128Z#000000#001#000000
contextCSN: 20151208154739.102248Z#000000#002#000000

I also did a stop/start of providers to force the replication process from 
difference because of the stop, but even they have done some replication 
between them, the difference in that concerned branch doesn't disappeared.

Can you help me to find out the root cause of this unsync mirrored systems ?
How can I check it deeper ?
Where do have I to check why I get this difference ?
Can It be related to system performance ? (memory ..)

Thx in advance for your help.

Brgds,
J-L.

PS. We use openldap version 2.4.35 under solaris 5.10 (zone systems)



============================================================================================================================
Disclaimer:  This message and the information contained herein is proprietary 
and confidential and subject to the Tech Mahindra policy statement, you may 
review the policy at http://www.techmahindra.com/Disclaimer.html externally 
http://tim.techmahindra.com/tim/disclaimer.html internally within TechMahindra.
============================================================================================================================

Reply via email to