On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Michael Wandel <[email protected]>
wrote:

> On 24.02.2017 16:02, Bernard Fay wrote:
> > sssd is not running and even removed.  At beginning we thought of using
> > it as it is the recommended way to go. But sssd requires the use of a
> > secured LDAP which we do not use as this LDAP is confined in a lab. We
> > use nscd.
>
> This ist not correct, sssd need this only for the authprovider , the
> idprovider can be used with plain ldap.
>
> best regards
>
>

I do not understand what is not correct in this.  The man page of sssd-ldap
is clear about it.





> Michael
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Michael Ströder <[email protected]
> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >
> >     Bernard Fay wrote:
> >     > passwd:     files sss ldap
> >     > shadow:     files sss ldap
> >     > group:      files sss ldap
> >
> >     This mix makes no sense at all. Either you use nss_sss to query sssd
> >     (which has its own
> >     cache in /var/lib/sss/db) or you use nss_ldap (direct or via
> >     nss-pam-ldapd).
> >
> >     Decide which components you really want to use and clean your config
> >     before going any
> >     further.
> >
> >     Ciao, Michael.
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to