Is the following valid. 1) Read transaction 1 is started 2) Read transaction 2 is started and calls mdb_dbi_open and commits 3) Read transaction 1 uses the handle from (2)
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 6:46 PM, Muhammed Muneer <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks. > > On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 6:29 PM, Klaus Malorny <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On 5/20/17 2:02 PM, Muhammed Muneer wrote: >> >>> So when the doc says >>> >>> * The database handle will be private to the current transaction >>> until >>> * the transaction is successfully committed. >>> >>> "the handle being private" only refers to the first mdb_dbi_open. >>> Once this transaction is committed, one doesn't have to call this again >>> in subsequent concurrent transactions and can use this handle. >>> And then this handle won't be private at all. >>> >>> Did I get it right? >>> >>> >> Yes. I do this exactly that way as part of my initial setup of my >> application. Once the transaction is committed, I use the returned handles >> setup from whatever thread that needs to access the respective database. I >> never call mdb_dbi_open again after the setup. >> >> Regards, >> >> Klaus >> >> >
