>>> Quanah Gibson-Mount <[email protected]> schrieb am 29.10.2018 um 17:03 in Nachricht <F73964C4E931CAA3C41163BE@[192.168.1.39]>: > --On Monday, October 29, 2018 9:03 AM +0100 Ulrich Windl > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Yes, you are right, regarding the docs, but still I wonder, why all the >> different URIs for a multi-homed LDAP-server should not use the same ID: >> If the ID designates the database where the data came from, that would >> make sense. Forcing different server IDs for every interface the server >> uses does not make that much sense to me. > > That's not how things work and that is not what the documentation is > saying. You specify only a single serverID and URI *per server* not per > URI that the server uses.
I don't quite understand (replicated cn=config for MMR): Assume a server has two IP addresses and names n1.d.o, n2.d.o associated with it. So the olcServerID: 1 ldap://n1.d.o:389 olcServerID: 1 ldap://n2.d.o:389 ...other servers... is illegal. How would the correct statement look like? How would it look like if I also include ldaps: URIs? > >>> " Non‑zero IDs are required when using multimaster replication and >>> each master must have a unique non‑zero ID." >>> >>> Note the words "must have" and "unique". >> >> Yes, that's the specification, but does it really make sense? > > Yes. > Regards, Ulrich
