Got it! Very helpful! Thank you!
> >> Hmm... so would you recommend removing the replication of cn=config for > >> now? Individually adding the schema to each master is feasible for us. > > > > If it's not required then yes, I personally would not use it at this > > time. For example, ITS#8286, although it only discusses a single matching > > rule, ended up touching numerous files, and it's directly related to > > using cn=config and cn=config replication > > (< > https://www.openldap.org/devel/gitweb.cgi?p=openldap.git;a=commitdiff;h > > =3add82a3bb30b94afd23ff5e2c00c59ca8a931d8>). > > To which I should add -- And is only being fixed for OpenLDAP 2.5 and > later. > ...2.5....any ETA on that? ;) Best, dave
