Le mer. 15 mai 2019 22:42, Quanah Gibson-Mount <[email protected]> a écrit :
> --On Wednesday, May 15, 2019 10:37 PM +0200 Manuela Mandache > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Le mer. 15 mai 2019 19:52, Quanah Gibson-Mount <[email protected]> a > > écrit : > > > > --On Wednesday, May 15, 2019 8:23 PM +0200 Manuela Mandache > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >>> Actually, the replication is in refreshAndPersist mode. > >> > >> Replication mode is immaterial. > > > Thanks a lot for your detailed and comprehensive answers. > > Heh, I can't tell in this case if your serious or sarcastic, but I'll note > this: it's entirely possible (and legal, and there are valid reasons for > it) to have an accesslog for a database where the environment is not > replicated at all. So replication mode, etc, is utterly immaterial to > whether or not an accesslog may exist, what its purge interval is, etc. > If > that helps. :) > Oh dear, I was totally serious, meaning to thank you for your three answers in one go. I might have been too formal, to the point of making you doubt - sorry, English is not my mother tongue and I live in France... Now that you mention it, I did read somewhere in the web-wide documentation that the delta-syncrepl is only one of the possible uses for the accesslog DB. And thanks again (seriously ;)) Manuela > >
