>>> "Ulrich Windl" <[email protected]> schrieb am 03.09.2020 um 08:29 in Nachricht <[email protected]>: >>>> Dieter Klünter <[email protected]> schrieb am 02.09.2020 um 19:04 in > Nachricht <[email protected]>: >> Am Wed, 2 Sep 2020 11:11:56 +0200 >> schrieb Olaf Hopp <[email protected]>: >> >>> Hi everybody, >>> >>> we are at the point of reorganising our LDAP. >>> Currently we only have posixGroups, but in future we also want to >>> support groupOfNames or groupOfUniqueNames >>> My question what is the common sense of usage ? >>> groupOfNames or groupOfUniqueNames ? >>> >>> I know your answers, you will say "it depends on your applications" >>> but currently I have no application using it. All my current >>> applications use my posixGroups. I just want to extend my LDAP for >>> future use cases. >>> >>> So what to take : groupOf Names or groupOfUniqueNames besides >>> posixGroup ? >> >> I would vote for groupOfnames. If you prefer groupOfUniqueNames you >> should provide uniqueness. >> >> https://ldapwiki.com/wiki/GroupOfUniqueNames%20vs%20groupOfNames >> https://ldapwiki.com/wiki/UniqueMember >> >> The use of posixgroup depends on your requirements. > > Actually I had never considered adding suplicates to a groupOfNames, mostly
s/suplicates/duplicates/ # sorry > because I cannot imaging a use case; anyone have a usew case? > >> >> -Dieter >> >> -- >> Dieter Klünter | Systemberatung >> http://sys4.de >> GPG Key ID: E9ED159B >> 53°37'09,95"N >> 10°08'02,42"E
