On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 09:04:49AM +0000, Lisa Parratt wrote: > Hi Quanah, > > It’s not a replication setup. The consumer is a relatively ancient > proprietary implementation of the syncrepl protocol, over which I have > very influence. > > I believe the problem is syncprov.c lines 3335 and 3341, which appear > to be setting `do_present = SS_PRESENT;` while simultaneously ignoring > the value of si->si_nopres. Replacing the lines above with `if ( > !si->si_nopres ) do_present = SS_PRESENT;` appears to fix the problem > for my use case, and is closer to how the logic worked in previous > versions of slapd.
Hi Lisa, I find it strange that you maintain a sessionlog (or use accesslog to host it) yet don't want to host a present/delete phase which is where they are useful. Could you explain what you're trying to achieve with your set up? -- Ondřej Kuzník Senior Software Engineer Symas Corporation http://www.symas.com Packaged, certified, and supported LDAP solutions powered by OpenLDAP
