On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 01:29:55PM +0200, Geert Hendrickx wrote: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 12:42:46 +0200, Ondřej Kuzník wrote: >> this sounds a lot like ITS#9641. Could you also check 2.6? > > Thanks Ondřej, yes that ITS describes the same issue. > I can still reproduce it with 2.6.2 as well as master.
Hi Geert, you mean the CSN recorded (a.k.a. "entryCSN:", not "reqMod: entryCSN:=") for these failed ops is still the original one rather than a new local SID? That would mean the ITS#9641 fix is not working and if that's the case, can you provide a test set up that reproduces this? Thanks, -- Ondřej Kuzník Senior Software Engineer Symas Corporation http://www.symas.com Packaged, certified, and supported LDAP solutions powered by OpenLDAP
