> -----Original Message----- > From: Howard Chu <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2026 5:25 PM > To: Windl, Ulrich <[email protected]>; [email protected] > Subject: [SUSPICIOUS] [EXT] Re: Stupid question about accesslog, delta- > syncrepl and efficiency > > Sicherheits-Hinweis: Diese E-Mail wurde von einer Person außerhalb des UKR > gesendet. Seien Sie vorsichtig vor gefälschten Absendern, wenn Sie auf Links > klicken, Anhänge öffnen oder weitere Aktionen ausführen, bevor Sie die > Echtheit überprüft haben. > > Windl, Ulrich wrote: > > Hi! > > > > > > Sorry for this stupid question: > > > > One argument for delta-syncrepl is that changing a small part of a large > object is much more efficient, because pnly the changed data is logged and > transferred. > > > > However with a multi-valued attributer like pwdHistory the accesslog entry > contains all the unchanged values also. E.g.: > > You don't need to replicate the reqOld attribute.
[Windl, Ulrich] I'm not reading the latest admin guide, but maybe there should be a note about accesslog and delta-syncrepl then. I used "olcAccessLogOld: (objectClass=*)" here. > > > > > > > Doesn’t that “cancel” the gain in efficiency? > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Ulrich Windl > > > > > > > > > -- > -- Howard Chu > CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com > Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ > Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/
