On Thu 10 of Oct 2013 14:08:58 ganesh kumar wrote:
> Until now we were trying to extend the existing providers.

For ease of development you can continue to extend existing providers. 
Separation to a new provider should be quite straight forward.

> If developing a new Nas provider is what it takes to make a contribution to
> OpenLMI, we will start working on it immediately.

Yes, we would like to have the NAS provider as separate provider (but still 
part of the openlmi-providers). What features do you plan to add?

> we hope your guidance will continue in the same way....

We'll try to do our best.


Radek Novacek

> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Radek Novacek <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Wed 09 of Oct 2013 16:31:33 ganesh kumar wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > >  We are implemented "NAS Network Ports" profile, Started with
> > > 
> > > ProtocolEndpoint class, we implemented "LMI_NASProtocolEndpoint" class,
> > > please review our code.
> > > 
> > > And also i have some doubt, How to add a condition when ever NFS process
> > > runs it has to create an instance in NASProtocolEndpoint class, what
> > 
> > logic
> > 
> > > should i use?
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I understand the SNIA NAS Network Port Profile quite differently. I
> > believe
> > that there should be one instance of LMI_NASProtocolEndpoint for each NFS
> > or
> > CIFS share in the system, not for each network port. This
> > LMI_NASProtocolEndpoint instance should be associated with existing
> > LMI_NetworkPorts through DeviceSAPImplementation.
> > 
> > May I ask if you're intending to submit your work to OpenLMI project? If
> > so,
> > please make the NAS provider an individual provider in the
> > openlmi-providers
> > repository (not part of networking provider). You can still depend on
> > classes
> > from networking provider, but we believe that this provider shouldn't be
> > part
> > of the networking provider itself.
> > 
> > We would be glad to include your contribution into the OpenLMI Project
> > once it
> > will be conceptually and formally correct.
> > 
> > Radek Novacek

_______________________________________________
openlmi-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/openlmi-devel

Reply via email to