2.6 as it needs to be tested and 2.4.6 releases is meant to be small 2.6 is a bigger release with packaging changes. Another good reason to get 2.6 under way.
On 8 March 2017 at 00:35, Raoul Snyman <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi guys, > > Recently we've had a couple of issues with having an "openlp.py" file as > our launcher file. We had to change the macOS and Windows builders to > rename it to "run_openlp.py" and while looking into building snaps recently > I also came across the same problem. > > The core of the problem is that Python's module system uses either the > file name or a directory with __init__.py in it for the module name. This > means that we essentially have two "openlp" modules in the same directory, > which confuses Python immensely. > > I propose we rename the file to "run_openlp.py" -- this won't have any > impact on our users, and not much impact on us. We'll just need to change > our packaging to take the name change into account (I know what I need to > do in the Debian package). > > Should we do this from 2.4.6 or wait for 2.6? > > -- > Raoul Snyman > +1 (520) 490-9743 > [email protected] > _______________________________________________ > openlp-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openlp.io/mailman/listinfo/openlp-dev > -- Tim and Alison Bentley [email protected]
_______________________________________________ openlp-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openlp.io/mailman/listinfo/openlp-dev
